On 8/10/21 7:01 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:36:38AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_IMP_DEF which indicate implementation defined PMU, never
>> actually gets used although there are '0xf' instances scattered all around.
>> Just do the macro replacement to improve readability.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> This applies on v5.14-rc5
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 6 +++---
>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Please can you split this with the KVM parts in their own patch?
Sure, will do.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
