On 13/08/21 12:39, Oliver Upton wrote:
Might it make sense to fix this issue under the existing locking
scheme, then shift to what you're proposing? I say that, but the
locking change in 03/21 would most certainly have a short lifetime
until this patch supersedes it.

Yes, definitely. The seqcount change would definitely go in much later. Extracting KVM_{GET,SET}_CLOCK to separate function would also be a patch of its own. Give me a few more days of frantic KVM Forum preparation. :)

Paolo

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to