On Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:40:00 +0100,
Quentin Perret <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 06 Aug 2021 at 12:31:07 (+0100), Will Deacon wrote:
> > From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> >
> > The protected mode relies on a separate helper to load the
> > S2 context. Move over to the __load_guest_stage2() helper
> > instead.
> >
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jade Alglave <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Shameer Kolothum <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 11 +++--------
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > index 05e089653a1a..934ef0deff9f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > @@ -267,9 +267,10 @@ static __always_inline u64 kvm_get_vttbr(struct
> > kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> > * Must be called from hyp code running at EL2 with an updated VTTBR
> > * and interrupts disabled.
> > */
> > -static __always_inline void __load_stage2(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned
> > long vtcr)
> > +static __always_inline void __load_guest_stage2(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> > + struct kvm_arch *arch)
> > {
> > - write_sysreg(vtcr, vtcr_el2);
> > + write_sysreg(arch->vtcr, vtcr_el2);
> > write_sysreg(kvm_get_vttbr(mmu), vttbr_el2);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -280,12 +281,6 @@ static __always_inline void __load_stage2(struct
> > kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long
> > asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "isb", ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT));
> > }
> >
> > -static __always_inline void __load_guest_stage2(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
> > - struct kvm_arch *arch)
> > -{
> > - __load_stage2(mmu, arch->vtcr);
> > -}
> > -
> > static inline struct kvm *kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
> > {
> > return container_of(mmu->arch, struct kvm, arch);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > index 9c227d87c36d..a910648bc71b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ void handle_host_mem_abort(struct kvm_cpu_context
> > *host_ctxt);
> > static __always_inline void __load_host_stage2(void)
> > {
> > if (static_branch_likely(&kvm_protected_mode_initialized))
> > - __load_stage2(&host_kvm.arch.mmu, host_kvm.arch.vtcr);
> > + __load_guest_stage2(&host_kvm.arch.mmu, &host_kvm.arch);
> > else
> > write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> > b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> > index d938ce95d3bd..d4e74ca7f876 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ int __pkvm_prot_finalize(void)
> > kvm_flush_dcache_to_poc(params, sizeof(*params));
> >
> > write_sysreg(params->hcr_el2, hcr_el2);
> > - __load_stage2(&host_kvm.arch.mmu, host_kvm.arch.vtcr);
> > + __load_guest_stage2(&host_kvm.arch.mmu, &host_kvm.arch);
>
> Nit: clearly we're not loading a guest stage-2 here, so maybe the
> function should take a more generic name?
How about we rename __load_guest_stage2() to __load_stage2() instead,
with the same parameters?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
