memslot_perf_test uses ucalls for synchronization between guest and host. Ucalls API is architecture independent: tests do not need know what kind of exit they generate on a specific arch. More specifically, there is no need to check whether an exit is KVM_EXIT_IO in x86 for the host to know that the exit is ucall related, as get_ucall() already makes that check.
Change memslot_perf_test to not require specifying what exit does a ucall generate. Also add a missing ucall_init. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <[email protected]> --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index d6e381e01db7..1727f75e0c2c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -127,43 +127,54 @@ static bool verbose; pr_info(__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0) +static void check_mmio_access(struct vm_data *vm, struct kvm_run *run) +{ + TEST_ASSERT(vm->mmio_ok, "Unexpected mmio exit"); + TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write, "Unexpected mmio read"); + TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.len == 8, + "Unexpected exit mmio size = %u", run->mmio.len); + TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.phys_addr >= vm->mmio_gpa_min && + run->mmio.phys_addr <= vm->mmio_gpa_max, + "Unexpected exit mmio address = 0x%llx", + run->mmio.phys_addr); +} + static void *vcpu_worker(void *data) { struct vm_data *vm = data; struct kvm_run *run; struct ucall uc; - uint64_t cmd; run = vcpu_state(vm->vm, VCPU_ID); while (1) { vcpu_run(vm->vm, VCPU_ID); - if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO) { - cmd = get_ucall(vm->vm, VCPU_ID, &uc); - if (cmd != UCALL_SYNC) - break; - + switch (get_ucall(vm->vm, VCPU_ID, &uc)) { + case UCALL_SYNC: + TEST_ASSERT(uc.args[1] == 0, + "Unexpected sync ucall, got %lx", + (ulong)uc.args[1]); sem_post(&vcpu_ready); continue; - } - - if (run->exit_reason != KVM_EXIT_MMIO) + case UCALL_NONE: + if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_MMIO) + check_mmio_access(vm, run); + else + goto done; break; - - TEST_ASSERT(vm->mmio_ok, "Unexpected mmio exit"); - TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.is_write, "Unexpected mmio read"); - TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.len == 8, - "Unexpected exit mmio size = %u", run->mmio.len); - TEST_ASSERT(run->mmio.phys_addr >= vm->mmio_gpa_min && - run->mmio.phys_addr <= vm->mmio_gpa_max, - "Unexpected exit mmio address = 0x%llx", - run->mmio.phys_addr); + case UCALL_ABORT: + TEST_FAIL("%s at %s:%ld, val = %lu", + (const char *)uc.args[0], + __FILE__, uc.args[1], uc.args[2]); + break; + case UCALL_DONE: + goto done; + default: + TEST_FAIL("Unknown ucall %lu", uc.cmd); + } } - if (run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO && cmd == UCALL_ABORT) - TEST_FAIL("%s at %s:%ld, val = %lu", (const char *)uc.args[0], - __FILE__, uc.args[1], uc.args[2]); - +done: return NULL; } @@ -268,6 +279,7 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, TEST_ASSERT(data->hva_slots, "malloc() fail"); data->vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, mempages, guest_code); + ucall_init(data->vm, NULL); pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n", max_mem_slots - 1, data->pages_per_slot, rempages); -- 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
