Don't update Posted Interrupt's NDST, a.k.a. the target pCPU, in the
pre-block path, as NDST is guaranteed to be up-to-date.  The comment
about the vCPU being preempted during the update is simply wrong, as the
update path runs with IRQs disabled (from before snapshotting vcpu->cpu,
until after the update completes).

The vCPU can get preempted _before_ the update starts, but not during.
And if the vCPU is preempted before, vmx_vcpu_pi_load() is responsible
for updating NDST when the vCPU is scheduled back in.  In that case, the
check against the wakeup vector in vmx_vcpu_pi_load() cannot be true as
that would require the notification vector to have been set to the wakeup
vector _before_ blocking.

Opportunistically switch to using vcpu->cpu for the list/lock lookups,
which presumably used pre_pcpu only for some phantom preemption logic.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c | 23 +++--------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
index 1688f8dc535a..239e0e72a0dd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
@@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ static void __pi_post_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  * - Store the vCPU to the wakeup list, so when interrupts happen
  *   we can find the right vCPU to wake up.
  * - Change the Posted-interrupt descriptor as below:
- *      'NDST' <-- vcpu->pre_pcpu
  *      'NV' <-- POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR
  * - If 'ON' is set during this process, which means at least one
  *   interrupt is posted for this vCPU, we cannot block it, in
@@ -139,7 +138,6 @@ static void __pi_post_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  */
 int pi_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-       unsigned int dest;
        struct pi_desc old, new;
        struct pi_desc *pi_desc = vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu);
 
@@ -153,10 +151,10 @@ int pi_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        local_irq_disable();
 
        vcpu->pre_pcpu = vcpu->cpu;
-       spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
+       spin_lock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->cpu));
        list_add_tail(&vcpu->blocked_vcpu_list,
-                     &per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
-       spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->pre_pcpu));
+                     &per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu, vcpu->cpu));
+       spin_unlock(&per_cpu(blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, vcpu->cpu));
 
        WARN(pi_desc->sn == 1,
             "Posted Interrupt Suppress Notification set before blocking");
@@ -164,21 +162,6 @@ int pi_pre_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        do {
                old.control = new.control = pi_desc->control;
 
-               /*
-                * Since vCPU can be preempted during this process,
-                * vcpu->cpu could be different with pre_pcpu, we
-                * need to set pre_pcpu as the destination of wakeup
-                * notification event, then we can find the right vCPU
-                * to wakeup in wakeup handler if interrupts happen
-                * when the vCPU is in blocked state.
-                */
-               dest = cpu_physical_id(vcpu->pre_pcpu);
-
-               if (x2apic_mode)
-                       new.ndst = dest;
-               else
-                       new.ndst = (dest << 8) & 0xFF00;
-
                /* set 'NV' to 'wakeup vector' */
                new.nv = POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR;
        } while (cmpxchg64(&pi_desc->control, old.control,
-- 
2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to