Hi Marc,
On 16/10/2021 14:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 17:14:13 +0100,
> James Morse <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> If the CPUs support HPDS2, and there is a DT description of PBHA values
>> that only affect performance, enable those bits for both TTBR0 and TTBR1.
>>
>> Enabling PBHA requires the hierarchical-permissions to be disabled.
>> Commit 87143f404f33 ("arm64: mm: use XN table mapping attributes for
>> the linear region") used these, but only as an optimisation.
>>
>> Only the necessary PBHA bits are enabled to reduce the risk of an
>> unsafe bit/value being used by accident.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 8694f9dec5e5..548c6f96a878 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -1676,6 +1679,71 @@ static bool has_hw_dbm(const struct
>> arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap,
>> +static bool plat_can_use_pbha_stage1(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities
>> *cap,
>> + int scope)
>> +{
>> + u8 val;
>> + struct device_node *cpus;
>> + const u8 *perf_only_vals;
>> + int num_perf_only_vals, i;
>> +
>> + if (!has_cpuid_feature(cap, scope))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Calls with scope == SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU need only testing whether this
>> + * cpu has the feature. A later 'system' scope call will check for a
>> + * firmware description.
>> + */
>> + if (scope == SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
>> + if (!cpus)
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> + perf_only_vals = of_get_property(cpus, "arm,pbha-performance-only",
>> + &num_perf_only_vals);
>> + if (!perf_only_vals)
>> + goto done;
>> +
>> + /* any listed value is usable at stage 1 */
>> + for (i = 0 ; i < num_perf_only_vals; i++) {
>> + val = perf_only_vals[i];
>> + if (val > 0xf)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + pbha_stage1_enable_bits |= val;
>> + set_bit(val, &arm64_pbha_perf_only_values);
>> + }
> Somehow, this would need to be exposed to userspace so that a VMM
> could tell a guest what it can use.
I'm assuming any user is very soc-specific... but it would help the VMM to know.
I guess KVM could return the bitmap as KVM_CAP_PBHA. There is no way to tell
the VMM what
the bits do, as that is imp-def...
Thanks,
James
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
