On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 15:30 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Lastly, this aligns the non-nested and nested usage of triggering posted > > > interrupts, and will allow for additional cleanups. > > > > It also aligns with SVM a little bit more (especially given patch 35), > > doesn't it? > > Yes, aligning VMX and SVM APICv behavior as much as possible is definitely a > goal > of this series, though I suspect I failed to state that anywhere. >
Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]> Best regards, Maxim Levitky _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
