On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 03:17:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 01:53:19PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > - vgic_v3_setup(vm, nr_vcpus, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
> > + ret = vgic_v3_setup(vm, nr_vcpus, 64, GICD_BASE_GPA, GICR_BASE_GPA);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + pr_info("Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping\n");
> Please use 'print_skip', which appends ", skipping test" to keep the skip
> messages consistent. Also, print_skip can't be disabled with -DQUIET like
> pr_info.
I see. It might be nice to convert these tests to use the ksft_
stuff...
> > - /* Distributor setup */
> > + /* Distributor setup - test if it's possible then actually do it */
> > + gic_fd = kvm_create_device(vm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3, true);
> > + if (gic_fd != 0)
> > + return -1;
> > gic_fd = kvm_create_device(vm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3, false);
> kvm selftests generally asserts on failure with the nonunderscore
> prefixed KVM ioctl wrapper functions, which is why you appear to
> be forced to do this nasty dance. However, kvm selftests usually
> always also offers an underscore prefixed version of the KVM ioctl
> wrapper function too for cases like these. So we can just do
> if (_kvm_create_device(vm, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3, false, &gic_fd) != 0)
> return -1;
And the _ version is OK to use in the vgic code? The _ makes it look
like it's internal only.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
