On 2022-02-23 09:27, [email protected] wrote:
From: Changcheng Deng <[email protected]>

Fix the following coccicheck review:
./arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c: 379: 3-4: Unneeded semicolon

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
index 0a00ef250725..3b16dae4ab3d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int kvm_psci_1_x_call(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu, u32 minor)
                                ret = 0;
                        }
                        break;
-               };
+               }
                fallthrough;
        default:
                return kvm_psci_0_2_call(vcpu);

Thanks for that. You may want to check why your script didn't pick
this particular instance of the same defect:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
index b43adf7dc29f..0d48d1e7291d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ int kvm_psci_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                return kvm_psci_0_1_call(vcpu);
        default:
                return -EINVAL;
-       };
+       }
 }

 int kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

I'll squash it into you patch and push it into -next.

Thanks,

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to