On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:25:19AM +0000, David Matlack wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 85b7bc333302..541b145b2df2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, 
> struct tdp_iter *iter,
>        * not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
>        */
>       for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++)
> -             sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, level, i);
> +             sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, level, i, 
> ACC_ALL);

Pure question: is it possible that huge_spte is RO while we passed in
ACC_ALL here (which has the write bit set)?  Would it be better if we make
it a "bool exec" to be clearer?

-- 
Peter Xu

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to