Hi, On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 05:41:37PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > There are various pmu tests that require an isb() between enabling > counting and the actual counting. This can lead to count registers > reporting less events than expected; the actual enabling happens after > some events have happened. For example, some missing isb()'s in the > pmu-sw-incr test lead to the following errors on bare-metal: > > INFO: pmu: pmu-sw-incr: SW_INCR counter #0 has value 4294967280 > PASS: pmu: pmu-sw-incr: PWSYNC does not increment if PMCR.E is unset > FAIL: pmu: pmu-sw-incr: counter #1 after + 100 SW_INCR > FAIL: pmu: pmu-sw-incr: counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR > INFO: pmu: pmu-sw-incr: counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=82 #1=98 > PASS: pmu: pmu-sw-incr: overflow on counter #0 after 100 SW_INCR > SUMMARY: 4 tests, 2 unexpected failures > > Add the missing isb()'s on all failing tests, plus some others that seem > required: > - after clearing the overflow signal in the IRQ handler to make spurious > interrupts less likely. > - after direct writes to PMSWINC_EL0 for software to read the correct > value for PMEVNCTR0_EL0 (from ARM DDI 0487H.a, page D13-5237). > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <[email protected]>
Looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
