On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 03:47:33PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > On 10/08/2022 20:30, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c > > index a78c1db23c68..cd5ad0936e16 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mteswap.c > > @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ bool mte_restore_tags(swp_entry_t entry, struct page > > *page) > > if (!tags) > > return false; > > > > + /* racing tag restoring? */ > > + if (!try_page_mte_tagging(page)) > > + return false; > > mte_restore_page_tags(page_address(page), tags); > > I feel like adding a "set_page_mte_tagged(page);" in here would avoid > the need for the comments about mte_restore_tags() taking the lock.
Good point. I think I blindly followed the set_bit() places but it makes sense to move the bit setting to mte_restore_tags(). Thanks for the review. -- Catalin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
