The arm/pmu test prints the value of counters as %ld.  Most tests start
with counters around 0 or UINT_MAX, so having something like -16 instead of
0xffff_fff0 is not very useful.

Report counter values as hexadecimals.

Reported-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.eli...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricar...@google.com>
---
 arm/pmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index 680623d..b6b2871 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -537,8 +537,8 @@ static void test_mem_access(bool overflow_at_64bits)
        write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
        isb();
        mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
-       report_info("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 
0));
-       report_info("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 
1));
+       report_info("counter #0 is 0x%lx (MEM_ACCESS)", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 
0));
+       report_info("counter #1 is 0x%lx (MEM_ACCESS)", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 
1));
        /* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */
        report((read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1)) &&
               (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) >= 20) && !read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void test_mem_access(bool overflow_at_64bits)
        mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E | pmcr_lp);
        report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x3,
               "Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters");
-       report_info("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx",
+       report_info("cnt#0=0x%lx cnt#1=0x%lx overflow=0x%lx",
                        read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1),
                        read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
 }
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
                write_sysreg(0x1, pmswinc_el0);
 
        isb();
-       report_info("SW_INCR counter #0 has value %ld", read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 
0));
+       report_info("SW_INCR counter #0 has value 0x%lx", 
read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0));
        report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == pre_overflow,
                "PWSYNC does not increment if PMCR.E is unset");
 
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
                (uint64_t)pre_overflow + 100;
        report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == cntr0, "counter #0 after + 100 
SW_INCR");
        report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 100, "counter #1 after + 100 
SW_INCR");
-       report_info("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=%ld #1=%ld",
+       report_info("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=0x%lx #1=0x%lx",
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
        report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
                "overflow on counter #0 after 100 SW_INCR");
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
        report((read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1) &&
                (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 1),
                "overflow and chain counter incremented after 100 
SW_INCR/CHAIN");
-       report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
+       report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=0x%lx #1=0x%lx", 
read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
 
        /* 64b SW_INCR and overflow on CHAIN counter*/
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
               (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0) == cntr0) &&
               (read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == cntr1),
               "expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN");
-       report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
+       report_info("overflow=0x%lx, #0=0x%lx #1=0x%lx", 
read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0),
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
 }
 
@@ -737,11 +737,11 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
        mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
        report(!read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) && (read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 
0x1),
                "odd counter did not increment on overflow if disabled");
-       report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value %ld",
+       report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx",
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0));
-       report_info("CHAIN counter #1 has value %ld",
+       report_info("CHAIN counter #1 has value 0x%lx",
                    read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1));
-       report_info("overflow counter %ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+       report_info("overflow counter 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
 
        /* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN enabled, +20 with CHAIN disabled 
*/
        pmu_reset();
-- 
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to