The numbers available without any severe programming changes are 100, 200, 189, 190, 195, and 265-290
165 to 188 are for voicemail. If you moved the 165-188 to 265-288, that might do it for you. If at all possible, it is recommended NOT to change too many numbers around (or delete existing functions). It can get confusing later when you (or someone else) tries to do standard things to the system but they won't work. I came across a system where an overzealous employee who took care of the system had deleted over half of the feature codes to allow extensions with 300 and 400 numbering. (He didn't just re-number them, he deleted them.) They asked me how to do paging and other basic stuff but everything I told them wouldn't work... I had to re-create a whole numbering scheme for their features. Charles Charles Patterson Global Communications Tarrytown, NY [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Padilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "kxt help" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:22 PM Subject: KX-T: re-numbering > Hello All- I need advice on freeing up more extension numbers in the 1xx > block. I think extension 165 to 188 is for the T-1, can I "trick" the > system by adding an asterick to the front of those to free them up? > > Thanks, Dan. > > > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > _________________________________________________________________ > KX-T Mailing list --- http://kxthelp.com/ > Subscription changes: http://kxthelp.com/mailman/listinfo/kxt > _________________________________________________________________ KX-T Mailing list --- http://kxthelp.com/ Subscription changes: http://kxthelp.com/mailman/listinfo/kxt
