Pak Mooh, it is not about I want to respect the regulation or not but we are talking about emergency I am happy you qoute the "an exceptionally slow-moving vehicle". So, I have mentioned before, that the hazard is working because of emergency... In the different situation and condition... Thank you... Sent from my BlackBerry� powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT
-----Original Message----- From: mooh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:11:13 To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [kymco-ID] Penggunaan Lampu Hazard yg Benar (was=Tanya Free X) saya gak yakin ada aturan tertulis secara khusus di undang2 indonesia om.. tapi mungkin ada yg lain yg bisa bantu secara internasional, bisa dibaca quote berikut == Hazard flashers International regulations have since the 1960s required vehicles to be equipped with a control which, when activated, flashes the left and right directional signals, front and rear, all at the same time and in phase. This function is meant to be used to indicate a hazard such as a vehicle stopped in or alongside moving traffic, a disabled vehicle, an exceptionally slow-moving vehicle, or a vehicle participating in a motorcade. Operation of the hazard flashers must be via a control independent of the turn signal control, and audiovisual telltale must be provided to the driver. In vehicles with a separate left and right green turn signal indicator on the dashboard, both left and right indicators may flash to provide visual indication of the hazard flashers' operation. In vehicles with a single green turn signal indicator on the dashboard, a separate red indicator light must be provided for hazard flasher indication. == -mooh- 2008/11/7 Yosep MYS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Situasinya beda lah. Gelap saat hujan, lampu rem belakang seringkali > nggak terlihat dibanding sein kelap-kelip. > > Kalau pas di terowongan gitu, saya sepakat harusnya nyalain lampu > utama saja, jangan hazard karena nggak darurat. BTW, bisa minta aturan > tertulis soal hazard lamp yang berlaku di NKRI? Saya siap berubah kok, > nggak anti perbaikan hehehe ;) > > -Yosep- > > > 2008/11/7 mooh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> lampu rem belakang harusnya cukup utk awareness kendaraan di belakang >> gak perlu hazard >> kembalikan fungsi hazard ke fungsi awalnya, ya utk emergency saat berhenti >> >> teman2 di HTML pernah riset soal efek lampu sen berkedip >> kalo terus menerus melihatnya krn berada di belakangnya.. bisa bikin pusing >> sangat mengganggu konsentrasi >> ibu gak bisa ngeliat jelas lampu rem belakang jg krn gangguan lampu yg >> berkedip itu >> jangan langsung apriori gak suka dng kampanye sprt ini >> kita kan males berubah..padahal itu yg bener >> >> di salah satu terowongan jor jelas2 ditulis, nyalakan lampu saat melewatinya >> eh.. masih banyak yg malah ngidupin hazard saat melewatinya.. >> asli ngawur.. mengganggu >> dan yg ngidupin hazard kok ya iseng banget.. ngidupin lampu kan sama >> mudahnya >> saya sering merhatiin, kalo yg ngidupin hazard saya tetep susah mengira >> jarak >> dibandingkan yg ngikutin aturan.. ngidupin lampu utama >> belum lagi kalo tiba2 listrik lampu2 terowongan itu mati.. bisa sangat gelap >> emangnya hazard bakal bisa bantu >> >> masalah warna pun sudah diriset jauh2 hari.. kenapa merah..kenapa kuning >> itu sudah disesuikan dng fisiologis respon manusia >> >> -mooh- > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
