Hi Javier, 2011/8/23 Javier Sola <[email protected]>: > I am trying to understand the logic of this. > > 1.- Single package for all languages + separate packs for help: > > - They occupy less in the servers, because there are no complete installers > for each language.
Right. > - The installer is in English (a foreign language in most cases). It is a multi language installer, language is automatically selected to match the language of the operating system, but it can be overridden manually. > - Users must install all least two packages. No, installing help is not necessary. There is the online wiki help. > - Requires post-handling of language settings (in English, most usually a > foreign language). No, Windows installer installs English + the language of the operating system. > Would it not be interesting to facilitate the labor of distribution by > producing packages that are easier to install by everybody (single > installers fully in local language)? For most of the people that we work > with (school teachers who do not speak English), the difference is between > being able to do it or not. If someone volunteers to do that, it's OK. Single language installers are still buildable, and even help can be included with little effort. I don't think that we should produce official TDF builds for all languages separately. But I can help you in producing a Khmer installer, if you are interested. Best regards, Andras -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
