Hi Andras
Scratching my head and testing more, I found a weird behaviour with
pootle search facility.
The first search of a bad word works correctly, it returns a list of
matches. On each element I change the bad word to a good word and submit.
But I want now to redo the search with the bad word... As in
double-checking the task I just did. I type the bad word in the search
box, set the scope, and hit return.
I get the same list, but filled with the good words, that I just corrected.
Bizarre...
So, it appears (IMHO) the search is done in a sort of data cache, but
the matches are taken from the database. Lokks like a synch is missing
there.
Could it be?
Regards
Olivier
Em 29-11-2011 06:52, Andras Timar escreveu:
Hello Olivier,
2011/11/29 Olivier Hallot<[email protected]>:
Hello Andras
If I recall correctly (my memory may fail), I used to locate a string in
pootle with the the "par_id" number... as in
helpcontent2 source\text\scalc\01\04060120.xhp 0 help
par_id4146942
It was precise and straightforward. No mistake.
However, now, this number is not in the comments area anymore... so I have
to look from the xhp file...
Am I correct in this diagnosis?
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/pt_BR/libo35x_help/translate.html?search=par_id4146942&sfields=source&sfields=target&sfields=notes&sfields=locations
Seems to be working...
Andras
--
Olivier Hallot
Founder, Board of Directors Member - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese
+55-21-8822-8812
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
