Hello all, assuming that our Sanskrit locale is unmaintained (just look at the list of contributors in https://translations.documentfoundation.org/sa_IN/), I just granted Babita all the permissions necessary for work (in fact, I granted all the permissions that the current locale maintainer had and the permission to overwrite existing translations on import).
In fact, a lot of Indic languages (incl. Sanskrit, Kashmiri and Dogri) had the same maintainer until now, who appears to only actually maintain Santali (at least that's the only language where he is the last contributor: https://translations.documentfoundation.org/sat/). I don't think it will hurt even if we don't wait for his input when giving permissions on unmaintained languages. By the way, does anyone know why we are using 'sa_IN' and not just 'sa' as a locale code for Sanskrit? Regards, Rimas On 2014.07.01 14:53, babita shinde wrote: > Hello, > > I have created following user name on pootle server > > username:- babitashinde123 > > Kindly give me an access for localization contribution of Libre office for > Sanskrit language. > > > Regards, > Babita Shinde > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
