2014-12-12 11:45 GMT+00:00 Stanislav Horáček <[email protected]>: > > Dne 12.12.2014 v 11:54 Olivier Hallot napsal(a): > >> >> >> On 12/12/2014 08:18, Sérgio Marques wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I don't get it. Now: 4.4 was created and translations from 4.3 >>>> >>>>> appeared there. >>>>> Future: Which translations will appear in 4.5 when it is created - from >>>>> 4.4 or from master? Translations of the same strings can differ between >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>> >>> Yes me too. Shopie´s explanation make it even more difficult to >>> understand >>> the procedure. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Since I do my own compilation, for me it will mean that all strings will >> be updated periodically in pootle under the "master" branch. So I will >> get the updates once in a day/week/month, for example. >> >> The number of strings on a monthly basis are expected to be lower than >> on updated once in a half-year for a major release. >> >> Those who will translate the master branch can check the results with >> the nighly builds. >> >> when it comes to branch for a new release, a snapshot of the master >> translation will be taken and named release X.Y. Then all translation of >> the release follows. Like with developers, a fix in a translation on a >> branch shall be fixed also in master branch. >> > > This workflow means that everyone is forced to work on master - otherwise > it is needed to translate the same strings again and again in branches > which makes no sense. > > And that's why I am confused - because we were assured that it will be > possible to choose between working on master and working on branches. > > >> This scheme does not means we will get less work, it means we will get >> more time to translate a big, hopefully incremental, chuck of new strings. >> >> > Keeping master updated always means more work and it is the reason why I > think that each team should decide if they want to use master or not. >
I tottaly agree with you. In fact, a while ago Shopie asked us if we wanted a master branch for our language. And my reply was very clear. NO. So why the hell someone decided to ignore what I and others told her? Where is the need to create a master branch for ALL languages even If we don´t want it? That will give more work to Cloph to create it and probably Christian will also have more work this way. And from what I can understand from this messages is that most of the translators don´t want a master branch. > > Best regards, > Stanislav > > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] > Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to- > unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- Sérgio Marques -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
