I translate for both AOO and LO. So I need to search a lot to work on the same string. I'm trying to place accelerators consistently for identical strings. And it would be easier if I don't have to scan over irrelevant strings. I agree that both systems don't handle it well. By the way, what's a JIRA?
> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:48:37 +0100 > Subject: Re: Pootle search AOO's vs LO's > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > On 22 January 2014 07:13, T J <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It seems to me that LibreOffice's Pootle server is a bit more inteligent > > than AOO's Pootle. For example, when you seach all for "Delete C~ells..." > > in LO's Pootle, you get 3 results in 1 page. With AOO's Pootle, you get 443 > > results. There're lots of Delete and other irrelevant words. Looks like > > AOO's Pootle has troubles with accelerators. > > > > > I dont see the big difference (except in numbers), search on c~ells, and > you get results like > C~ollect > C~enter > .... > > So I would say both systems dont handle it well. > > The difference is because LO pootle is still 2.5.0 while we have upgrade to > 2.5.1, which gives a number of new features. > > If you feel its a real error, then please create a JIRA, since the pootle > server is a shared Apache service. > > rgds > jan I.
