The actual
situation is as follows:
I got a
wordlist with lemmas and Part-of-Speech tags and created an affix file by a
grammar. To connect the words and the rules I wrote a Java program which
replaces some PoS-tags by the rule name. Some of them were connected manually.
Yes, I can imagine, that the tool works well for maintenance, so I can use it
now.
Exactly, now
I have to remove redundancy. And the compounding isn’t working yet.
For example:
I have the words tschun/Zxyz, in/Zxyz and melli/xyz in the dictionary and
the rule Z in my affixfile:
SFX Z Y 26
SFX Z 0 onta/WXZxyz [gt] #
10
SFX Z 0 tschien/Xxyz .
#
100
SFX Z 0 melli/Xxyz . # 1000
SFX Z 0 s/V [ai] # dua, trei --> duas, treis
SFX Z a s/V dua
SFX Z in endisch in #
11
SFX Z a disch/W a # dudisch (12)
SFX Z i disch/W i #
tredisch (13)
SFX Z ater itordisch/W quater # quitordisch (14)
SFX Z t disch/W quent #
quendisch (15)
SFX Z is edisch/W sis # sedisch (16)
SFX Z dua vegn/ZW
dua
# 20
SFX Z 0 conta/WXZxyz un
# 50
SFX Z 0 sonta/WXZxyz
s
# 60
SFX Z ov avonta/WXZxyz nov
# 90
SFX Z a in/ZXxyz a
# trentin(31), curontin(41)
SFY Z in emprem/W
in
# 1.
SFY Z in prem in # 1.
SFX Z dua secund/W
dua
# 2.
SFX Z rei ierz/W
trei
# tierz (3.)
SFX Z rei erzio
trei
# terzio (3.)
SFX Z ter rt/W
quater
# quart (4.)
SFX Z tschun quint/W
tschun
# quint (5.)
SFX Z 0 avel/W
[uiaton][nstgv]
# 6.,7. etc.
SFX Z rei iarza
trei
# tiarza (1/3)
SFX Z ent
int quent
tschuncontamelli is correctly identified and
tschuncontainmelli (not correct) is suggested, but the right word
tschuncontinmelli isnt found. Why not? How is the compounding working?
I am testing on the prompt, because I cant see
the extension in the OO Writer. I imported it via extension manager but it isn’t
available for the spell check yet.
My extension consist of the dic, the aff, the description.xml,
the dictionary.xcu and a readme.txt with the license, so whats wrong?
Regards,
Maria
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:44:04 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Spellchecker for Rhaeto-Romanic
>
> On 12/08/2014 Maria Hartmann wrote:
> > Good morning,
> > the proofing tool gui is no help, sadly.
>
> I had understood that what you wanted to do is maintenance and checks on
> a dictionary, so that you had already created you .dic file, your .aff
> file and added (manually) the rules to the .dic file. This is how
> maintenance is normally done, and it is the scenario in which the tool
> is useful.
>
> Are you at another stage instead? I mean, what does your .aff file look
> like? Are you at the stage where you have a huge wordlist collected
> randomly (so, not by hand) and you created some .aff rules and want to
> remove redundancy (i.e., obtaining an equivalent dictionary with
> annotated words in the .dic file)?
>
> It will greatly help (if you are still stuck here) if you copy and paste
> ten lines (no attachments please) from your .dic file and .aff file.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
