John,
You are mistaken. IMO the WG would benefit from hearing
from *L1* (not L3) operators on this topic.
Lou
At 11:03 AM 5/12/2006, Drake, John E wrote:
> I agree that hearing from the folks that operate *transport* networks
> would be of huge value. Unfortunately, they typically don't show at
> IETF. There actually was someone from such a group at the last
> meeting who came up to me after the meeting and stated the (1) they
> would only do OSPF and (2) that they would need a multi-area support
> in the OSPF solution. I asked him if he'd post his opinion on the
> list and he said he would, unfortunately we haven't seen this mail
> and I didn't take down his name. Sigh...
Unless I am mistaken, it seems that you are asking the working group to
trust you to interpret the requirements of the carriers wishing to offer
L1VPN services.
_______________________________________________
L1vpn mailing list
L1vpn@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
