HI Dominique, Sorry, but I haven't got time to check this. But, Hope to have some time available this weekend to check that.
Regards. "Cressatti, Dominique" wrote: > Hi Samag, > > have you got that working >Linux_firewall+L2TP+IPsec<==>Box_doing_NAT<==>Linux_firewall+L2TP+IPseec > or Linux_firewall+L2TP+IPsec<==>Box_doing_NAT<==>Windows_box > > Regards > Dom > -----Original Message----- > From: Samag Alvarado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 13 November 2002 16:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: client behind NAT > > Hi Dominic. > > Is NAT 1-to-1? If so, you shouldn't have any problem, else have a port 500 > udp forward to your internal Machine, and also protocol 50 and 51. > > I haven't tried this, but I think should work. > > Regards > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Cressatti, Dominique > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 8:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: client behind NAT > > Hi folks, > > as anyone got L2TP (with or without IPSEC) working behind > NAT? > > In more details my Windows client is behind a NAT box and > attempt to establish an L2TP tunnel to a Linux box. > > Dom
