> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Robert Raszuk [mailto:[email protected]]
> 发送时间: 2012年5月9日 19:01
> 收件人: Ivan Pepelnjak
> 抄送: Keshava A K; [email protected]; Xuxiaohu; [email protected]; [email protected]
> 主题: Re: [nvo3] Facilitating the load-balancing of L2VPN/L3VPN traffic over IP
> PSN using MPLS-in-UDP encapsulation// fwd: New Version Notification for
> draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-00.txt
> 
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> > True, but then you need a mechanism to discover all the available
> > endpoints, whereas with single VTEP per host you can use existing
> > mechanisms (either learning from source IP address or next-hop
> > distribution with BGP-like protocols).
> 
> True.
> 
> I see few options:
> 
> - Signal different next hops in BGP for the application which runs across
> 
> - Treat next hop in BGP as prefix indicator not as host route. In
> particular next hop resolves in IGP to a prefix which in turn could be
> used as set of GRE destination addresses
> 
> - Signal such range explicitly. I think there will be a draft coming up
> on just that soon.

Hi all,

The draft that Robert mentioned is now available at 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-idr-tunnel-address-prefix-00.  Any comments 
and suggestions are welcome.

BTW, thanks Robert for your pre-announcement of this draft ;)

Best regards,
Xiaohu


Reply via email to