On Apr 2, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:

> - External VPN forwarder at page 12 appears not to support QinQ, should it?

The document describes the behavior of the end-system and the external 
Forwarder. In my mind, the scenario where Q-in-Q (or other L2 encap) is used 
between the end-system and the Forwarder because of additional L2 hops should 
not need to be explicitly described.

> 
> - Draft seems IPv4 centric, with static /32 often appearing, while
> IPv6 support is explicitly mentioned.

Searching thought the document /32 seems to appear in examples. If you don't 
mind pointing out explicitly where you believe the text should be corrected, i 
would appreciated (private email is ok).


> 
> - Draft mentions GRE and MPLS supported, but most examples speak as if
> it's always GRE encapsulated.

MPLS over GRE or MPLS over UDP are used currently. MPLS over ethernet directly 
would require the end-system to participate in the IGP and have LDP enabled 
which is not to my knowledge a practical scenario.

>   It's not clear to me how VPN forwarder would connect via MPLS to a
> P or PE node, where would IGP label come.
>   Or should  end-system route server<->PE have OptB? (Would also give
> label security, so VPN forwarder would not need to be fully trusted)

The route-server is not on the forwarding path.
The data-center gateway typically implements option B (or IBGP plus next-hop 
self) and stitches the MPLS-over-GRE LSP segment (internal to the DC) with an 
MPLS over L2 LSP segment outside the data-center, in scenarios where the 
service is delivered to a WAN L3VPN.

> 
> 
> 
> On 2 April 2013 01:46,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks Working 
>> Group of the IETF.
>> 
>>        Title           : BGP-signaled end-system IP/VPNs.
>>        Author(s)       : Pedro Marques
>>                          Luyuan Fang
>>                          Ping Pan
>>                          Amit Shukla
>>                          Maria Napierala
>>                          Nabil Bitar
>>        Filename        : draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-01.txt
>>        Pages           : 21
>>        Date            : 2013-04-01
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   This document describes a solution in which the control plane
>>   protocol specified in BGP/MPLS IP VPNs [RFC4364] is used to provide a
>>   Virtual Network service to end-systems.  These end-systems may be
>>   used to provide network services or may directly host end-to-end
>>   applications.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-01
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-l3vpn-end-system-01
>> 
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  ++ytti

Reply via email to