Joe,
I think I made a mistake by submitting them as Errata without checking
with others. I completely agree that I should have first send out a mail on the
mailing list to ask the wider audience about this.
I will surely not skip this step in future.
Thanks for your kind reply.
Regards,
Bharat
________________________________________
From: Joe Touch [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:28 PM
To: RFC Errata System
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; Bharat Joshi
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4364 (3648)
FWIW, this should be rejected.
The original text is correct and more than sufficient.
Bharat - you might want to check these with others in advance of issuing
them as errata.
Joe
On 6/12/2013 1:58 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4364,
> "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4364&eid=3648
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Bharat Joshi <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> If two routes to the same IP address prefix are actually routes to different
> systems, it is important to ensure that BGP not treat them as comparable.
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> If two routes to the same IP address prefix are actually routes to two
> different systems, it is important to ensure that BGP not treat them as
> comparable.
>
> Notes
> -----
> 'routes to different system' should be 'routes to two different system'
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4364 (draft-ietf-l3vpn-rfc2547bis-03)
> --------------------------------------
> Title : BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
> Publication Date : February 2006
> Author(s) : E. Rosen, Y. Rekhter
> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source : Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks INT
> Area : Internet
> Stream : IETF
> Verifying Party : IESG
>
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are
not
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other
person and
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has
taken
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any
damage
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out
your
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this
e-mail
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
