Hi Nagendra,

It can also be automatically negotiated through signaling among those egress 
PEs. I have composed the following draft for this point.
ICCP Application TLVs for VPN Route Label Sharing - Mingui ZHANG
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-pwe3-iccp-label-sharing-00.txt

Thanks,
Mingui

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 4:55 PM
>To: Mingui Zhang; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: New Version Notification for 
>draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00.txt
>
>Hi,
>
>Thanks. Is the proposal is to manually assign/configure in each PE?.
>
>-Nagendra
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mingui Zhang [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 2:21 PM
>To: Nagendra Kumar (naikumar); [email protected]
>Subject: RE: New Version Notification for 
>draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00.txt
>
>Hi Nagendra,
>
>In the method, the egress PEs in the RG have to use the same VPN route label
>for one VPN site (e.g., 1100 for VPN1).
>As for the prefix, all prefixes (e.g., 10.1.1.0/24) learnt from this VPN site 
>will be
>stored in the corresponding VRF (e.g., VPN1' VPN instance) identified by the 
>VPN
>route label.
>
>I guess you propose to share the label "per-prefix". It's possible to do so 
>but not
>as common as the "per-VRF" assignment in current practice.
>
>Thanks,
>Mingui
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) [mailto:[email protected]]
>>Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 4:15 PM
>>To: Mingui Zhang; [email protected]
>>Subject: RE: New Version Notification for
>>draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00.txt
>>
>>Hi Mingui,
>>
>>I couldn’t see any point mentioned in this draft on how egress PEs will
>>assign same VPN label for the prefix.
>>
>>Can you please share the same?. Sorry, if I am missing something in the doc.
>>
>>Regards,
>>nagendra
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>>Of Mingui Zhang
>>Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:16 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: FW: New Version Notification for
>>draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00.txt
>>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>We have submitted a new draft: Label Sharing for Fast PE Protection.
>>
>>   This draft designs a simple method to be used by SPs to achieve fast
>>PE protection, utilizing the deployment of redundant egress PEs.
>>
>>Comments are welcome.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mingui
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>
>>A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00.txt
>>has been successfully submitted by Mingui Zhang and posted to the IETF
>>repository.
>>
>>Filename:      draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing
>>Revision:      00
>>Title:                 Label Sharing for Fast PE Protection
>>Creation date:         2013-07-12
>>Group:                 Individual Submission
>>Number of pages: 12
>>URL:
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00.
>>txt
>>Status:
>>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing
>>Htmlized:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-l3vpn-label-sharing-00
>>
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   This document describes a method to be used by Service Providers to
>>   provide fast protection of VPN connections for a CE. Egress PEs in a
>>   redundant group always assign the same label for VPN routes from a
>>   VRF. These egress PEs create a BGP virtual Next Hop (vNH) in the
>>   domain of the IP/MPLS backbone network as an agent of the CE router.
>>   Primary and backup tunnels terminated at the vNH are set up by the
>>   BGP/MPLS IP VPN based on IGP FRR. If the primary egress PE fails, the
>>   backup egress PEs can recognize the "shared" VPN route label and
>>   deliver the failure affected packets accordingly.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>The IETF Secretariat

Reply via email to