I as a co-author is not aware of any IPR relevant to new procedures specified in the draft.
Thanks. Jeffrey Zhang > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: EXT - [email protected] > Subject: WG adoption poll - draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress- > replication-01 > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week poll on adopting > draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress-replication-01 [1]. > > Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or > not (in the latter case, please also state the reasons). > > This poll runs until January the 22nd. > > > Coincidentally, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that > applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in > compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for > more details). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to > this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The draft > will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author > and contributor. > > If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author > or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of > any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > Thank you, > > Martin & Thomas > l3vpn chairs > > [1] > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-bidir-ingress- > replication
