Hello,
This call for adoption is closed and we consider that there is consensus
to adopt draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet as a working group document
aiming Informational status.
We have taken note of comments about limitations of the approach: the
document, now a WG item, will have to document these. All working group
contributors are welcome to propose text in this perspective.
Authors, can you first resubmit the document as-is, as
draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-subnet-00 ?
Thanks,
Martin & Thomas
l3vpn co-chairs
2014-02-04, Thomas Morin:
Hello working group,
This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet [1] as a working group item.
Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
This poll runs until February 9th.
*Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
and 5378 for more details).
==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please
respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR.
The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
each author and contributor.
If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author
or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
Thank you,
Martin & Thomas
l3vpn chairs
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-l3vpn-virtual-subnet
