Martin: Agreed. I was trying to do a +1 to Eric's suggestion without using it since +1 is now politically incorrect (PI).
Sue -----Original Message----- From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 9:55 AM To: Susan Hares; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Idr] [mpls] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-l3vpn-pmsi-registry-02 Sue, I guess what Eric says is that if it effectively does, then this should be indicated in the header and mentioned in the Abstract/intro. -m Le 13/06/2014 15:49, Susan Hares a écrit : > Eric: > > It relates and it updates the IANA section in RFC6514. > > Sue > > -----Original Message----- > From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Rosen > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 9:01 AM > To: Martin Vigoureux > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Idr] [mpls] WG Last Call on > draft-ietf-l3vpn-pmsi-registry-02 > > > I support this document; however, I think it should be categorized as > an Update to RFC 6514. > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr > > >
