> On Oct 23, 2014:6:08 PM, at 6:08 PM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Ok .. I only based that statement on few recent requests from chairs asking
> explicitely only authors to state the IPR knowledge of their docs.
>
> To Tom's point if this is "ill advised and strongly discouraged" to talk
> about IPR on the lists what is this thread all about then ? Why it has been
> even started ? To blindly say yes or no to content of the IPR disclousure no
> one posseses any knowledge of ?
Discussing the IPR policy itself is cool, but the specifics of
particular patents has been discouraged.
—Tom
>
> r.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Martin Vigoureux
> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Robert
>
> Le 23/10/2014 21:22, Robert Raszuk a écrit :
> Chairs normally ask only authors for IPR statement.
>
> I do not believe this is the norm.
> IETF IPR policies concern a broader set of people than "authors".
>
> -m
>
