The following errata report has been rejected for RFC4659, "BGP-MPLS IP Virtual Private Network (VPN) Extension for IPv6 VPN".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4659&eid=4087 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Wesley George <[email protected]> Date Reported: 2014-08-18 Rejected by: Adrian Farrel (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- No "updates" metadata reference to update RFC4364 Corrected Text -------------- This document updates RFC4364 (and associated metadata links) Notes ----- RFC4659 provides an extension to the standard defined in RFC4364 to add IPv6 support to a standard that was originally IPv4-only. This metadata link will make it clearer for implementers that both standards are necessary for a full implementation. --VERIFIER NOTES-- Considering the definition of "updates", the normal terms of an errata report, and the discussion on the Bess mailing list I am rejecting this. This should not be construed as meaning that IPv6 support is not critically important: BGP/MPLS VPNs should, of course, be fully functional in IPv6 networks. -------------------------------------- RFC4659 (draft-ietf-l3vpn-bgp-ipv6-07) -------------------------------------- Title : BGP-MPLS IP Virtual Private Network (VPN) Extension for IPv6 VPN Publication Date : September 2006 Author(s) : J. De Clercq, D. Ooms, M. Carugi, F. Le Faucheur Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks INT Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
