First, I'd like to note that my domain apparently been compromised and Jean's server bounces it, which makes replying a little more difficult than it could be.
In previous email Jean suggested to check string to ensure that I have correct kernel version. Which I will do once I get around to it. To be honest this raises a question. If I in fact have wrong kernel version, could I get that particular one? I also think that for tests to make sense I'd need compiler version and arguments passed to it. I don't think that explanation on purpose of that is needed. Also, please be advised that I am not yet ready to run benchmarks and it may take *more* than a day or so before I will be ready. Not because, I am missing software, but rather because mach has paging issue and need to set everything up and recompile with compatible options. > > Well obvious solution to Mach's problems is critical path optimizations. > wow, /me wonders why no-one ever thought about that... Fact that people thought about it, does not mean that it has been done and/or ineffective. > > Well, I was talking about "First class flexpage-based address > > spaces" paper presented in by Shapiro in(around) 2000. > > (Unfortunatly I was only able to browse the text version provided by > google since the Server providing the post script version is down) I am attaching paper to the message. Don't know if mailing list server will not strip it. Sincerely, IS.
SRL2000-03.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
