Hi Arthur, (explicitly cc:'d to Björn Döbel, the maintainer of l4ore)
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 12:49, Arthur Mielimonka wrote: > I was told recently that you are currently in the process of dumping > oskit in favor of uclibc or dietlibc. > For my work, I need the log_net server which only compiles with oskit. > So I cannot abandon it. > Are they any problems or reasons why one shouldn't use oskit? > Is it possilble to use a mixed configuration (e.g. compile log_net with > oskit and own packages with dietlibc and use them together)? There are several reasons, some of them are: - oskit is quite fat and complex. The internal COM interface makes it - oskit is not maintained anymore difficult to understand what happens if a new library is added - oskit1.0 is GPL It should be possible to compile the log_net server using the oskit and compile the other parts of L4env with dietlibc or uClibc. However, it would make much sense to port the log_net interface to the new ore server (l4/pkg/ore). Björn, could you give an estimation about the effort to port log_net to ore? Frank -- ## Dept. of Computer Science, Dresden University of Technology, Germany ## ## http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/~fm3 ##
pgpZ4ycIkhEYk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ l4-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/mailman/listinfo/l4-hackers
