On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 16:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why _doesn't_ chroot just build a sub hurd? > > Because setting up a sub-hurd involves a lot of work. First you need > a image of the drive you wish to use, then you need to copy a _fully > bootable_ system onto that image. And only then can you actually use > the sub-hurd. > > It would be better to just not recommend chroot() on the GNU system, > and implement a easier way for setting up sub-hurds.
Yes, but it would be even better to have a really cheap, ubiquitous confinement mechanism that is the normal way of running things. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
