On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 14:39 +0200, ness wrote: > As endpoints are mappable objects in upcoming L4s, we have the same > problems like with capabilities, IMHO. Maybye it's not that important, > as endpoints aren't exchanged that often, but I guess we needed an > endpoint server, too? > One more point to hope for copy semantics or to emulate 'em?
Yes, there *does* appear to be a reductio problem here, doesn't there. I rejected REVOKABLE COPY for other reasons before I got around to noticing this issue. Thanks! shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
