Hi, > If you look at my protocols, this imposes an additional IPCs and > system calls in the RPC path for every capability that should be > copied from one process to another. As capability copy is expected to > be ubiquituous, this is a discouraging result.
Is it really? My Guess would be that in typical use, capability passing of any kind should happen seldom enough not to make a few more IPCs/syscalls critical... But well, I guess I'm overlooking something :-) -antrik- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
