For example, consider that in some cities in the Southern US non-caucasion people are the majority. However, in the entire country they are still a minority.
And in the whole world non-caucasion are a majority. [...] PC's outnumber dumb terminals vastly. Not true, since PC's get used as dumb terminals. So you have the classic dumb terminals like VT-320's, in addition to terminals that are PC's. So dumb terminals out number the amount of PC's. Then you have a globally differentiated system. The _average_ user does not run a 25 CPU box at home. That is why it is called a `server'. Many large companies MAY do so, but you're still looking at only a potential of a few million users compared to a few BILLION users. You realise that more users use dumb terminals than their own machines right? For proof you need look only to where the money is: What sells more, PC's or NC's? A PC is what in this context? A dumb terminal? Server? Once again you're making absurd comparsions between two completely different things. What sells more: servers or client machine? OBVIOUSLY client machines, but that doesn't say anything of what is more used, which are the servers. _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
