On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 23:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If there is a design lesson to be learned from the slow progress of the > original Hurd, than it is the simple realization that it was *too > ambitious*. Now the right conclusion from that is certainly not to go > for something even less realistic.
Antrik: As with Alfred's concern about POSIX, this is also a valid concern. I think that within the next three months we will be able to resolve this concern. For the moment, I would say: the discussion that has been going on is only useful if it leads to a concrete design that we can implement. What makes *me* worried is that absolutely *nobody* has responded to my suggestion about how to get to coding productively. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
