a) There is plenty of documentation b) It is easy to write code for c) The end users can set the system up with the least technical knowledge/effort as possible
These are things that Microsoft did, these things work. Microsoft didn't do any of those, you must be from a different universe if you honestly claim that... And can we stick to free systems? We can't look at how non-free ones are implemented, examine their documentation, how the tools behave etc. Being open source, there are other benefits that cant be ignored. Being open source there are many reasons to ignore it, the first and most important is that just because something is open source doesn't mean that it is free software. And since we are only interested in free systems (where we can look at how things are implemented), this has no relevance to anything. _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
