At Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:07:27 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No wonder this project isn't going anywhere, with the core developers > lacking a vision of what the Hurd has to offer.
Or maybe we have too many visions :) > I really wish you would > come to my presentation; maybe I could give you at least a slight idea > of what vast possiblities I see in the Hurd design, why I'm interested > in it in the first place. You can make a recording, and put it online. You definitely can make the slides available online. Please post a link. If you need space to host, let me know. > Mind you, all of them fit perfectly well in Hurd's POSIX++ approach. I will try to determine this when I have actually heard your arguments. I will answer the rest of your mail later. But note that I see deep difficulties in any approach that starts with POSIX, and then tries to improve it after the fact. Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
