> You want a absurd
> level of security that is simply not needed for a system that one uses
> on a daily basis.
Based on the number of daily break-ins, this statement is pretty
obviously inconsistent with observed reality.
I have yet to this day see someone break into one of my systems, and
I'm simply don't care about security. Infact, I love security so much
that my whole home directory is avaiable through http for anyone to
browse.
1. POSIX is not a securable foundation, but you are unable to let
it go, or
2. You imagine that real security must be horribly invasive
and therefore unusable.
Which is it?
It is 3: POSIX is a securable foundation. The amount of security
breakage that one can do is minimal, the remainin 0.1% are not
feasable for real world programs.
_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
