Nope. I mean what I said, and not the opposite of what I said. This is usually true, unless I make a mistake. In this case, I didn't.
Actually you you are mistaken. I do not dig into the internals of the FSF, so maybe my impression was wrong. But I definitely remember that I saw something, maybe a quote or an announcement, which indicated that Linux was going to be the official GNU kernel. This was in spring 2001. Your claim makes no sense, if the Hurd was so darn broken in 2001, then I fail to see how 150 commits later (in 2002) it was so fixed that one could make a release of it. You know that doesn't make any sense right? And I do not recall any such statment from RMS about ditching the Hurd, only `our difficulties to debugin asynchrounus multithreaded programs'. In other words, what you say happened, didn't happen. _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
