As usual, you failed to quote the relevant part of the email you're replying to. That is very unfortunate because it makes it next to impossible to seriously discuss a specific technical issue with you. In particular, you missed my point on functional languages. Too bad.
I quoted all relevant parts, I was talking about _most_ lisp's. You answered with Guile which isn't really a lisp in the classical sense to begin with! Now think Common, Zeta, Mac, NIL, .... All of the classical lisps has a globally mutable name space, you _can_ subdivide it a bit, but not much. _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
