On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 13:50 +0100, ness wrote:
> All you say is true. But in my eyes it's not the system's part to define 
> the maximum size of a path. It should allow to pass unlimited size 
> strings, and the filesystems decide what to do. Maybye it skips the 
> string after 4096 sign. Or, if this is not required, it doesn't do so.

The EROS/Coyotos kernel (plus utilities) do provide this mechanism.

shap



_______________________________________________
L4-hurd mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd

Reply via email to