Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap <at> eros-os.org> writes: > > Not intended to be complete, just thought provoking, and I'm thinking > single-user here: > > A secure operating system is one where, after I unintentionally > run an actively hostile program, I'm still in control of the machine. > > The key word is "unintentional", because it implies that I shouldn't > need to do anything special to ensure my safety. > > shap >
Hello, Why the restriction to single user? By restating the definition as: A secure operating system is one where no process is allowed to deny a user control of that user's resources. the single-user case is made a subset of the general case. No? Stève Toléqué _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
