Hi, "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that in the end persistence is a matter of taste. It has allowed > us to structure the EROS system very differently, and we have found the > results to be powerful. Having said that, it is a struggle to articulate > *why* this should be so, and I am not satisfied that I have done so. Recently, Marcus showed how persistence could elegantly solve the passive translator problem[0]. Can you explain how an application can serialize its state, including capabilities it holds, given that capabilities are "not representable as bits"? Thanks, Ludovic. [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/2005-10/msg00081.html _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
