Scribit Michal Suchanek dies 24/04/2006 hora 11:07: > There are quite a few counterexamples. For one, Windows 98 are much > faster on common hardware than Windows 2000 or XP. Yet there is large > user base for the later because of much better stability.
I'm not sure if it is the real explanation of their user base. They are above all installed and selled on new systems, and these systems are just more recent and thus faster than the average system on which 98/ME are used. So there is a user base because user don't really have choice (or think they have not) and the performance problem did not seem to me to be really perceived by users. Monopolisticly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list L4-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
