-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > Trivial confinement is profoundly > (and deliberately) weaker. This may actually be good for Marcus's > objectives, but it seems useful to understand precisely what is being > lost technically, and what impact this may have in practice. > > So I will start a new thread for this first. >
This is great. I'd like to say that all this discussion has been extremely confusing. I tried to sketch it a bit at http://hurd.gnufans.org/bin/view/Hurd/HowMuchConfinementDoWeWant. - -- - -ness- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEViTFvD/ijq9JWhsRAio8AJ4/6nRVHGcHy02JGg5q58tCFKYhDACfYjx/ wI/zvvOYxuK/QJeFu8mppWQ= =A72l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
