At Tue, 23 May 2006 12:13:17 -0400, "Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. RMS is mistaken about a detail: the source of DRM compatibility in > Coyotos is *not* the constructor per se. It is the combination of the > constructor logic and the requirement of opaque storage.
Just to make sure that this is recorded: I did not describe the constructor mechanism separately from the storage transparency issue at that time, but both together as a single mechanism. So, if RMS had or has any misunderstanding on this, it would be my fault. What happened is just that I described the constructor mechanism as it existed in EROS. Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
